Evaluation of mastectomy with immediate autologous latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy: A single institution study of 111 cases of invasive breast carcinoma.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate morbidity and patient satisfaction following surgically treated skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM) with immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) following mastectomy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), and preoperative radiotherapy (RT), for operable invasive breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective single-institution study included 111 patients who underwent a mastectomy with IBR after RT and/or NACT for invasive breast carcinoma at the Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest Paul Papin from January 1997 to January 2012. Only patients with breast reconstruction by autologous latissimus dorsi flap with (LDI) or without (ALD) implant were considered. The primary endpoints were the delay in therapeutic sequence, post-operative complication rate, surgical revision rate, time of hospitalization and the anonymous analysis of the patient satisfaction survey. RESULTS: 111 patients underwent mastectomy after RT. The median age was 48 years old and the median body mass index (BMI) was 23.6. SSM were performed in 94.5% of cases. The median interval between the end of chemotherapy (CT) and the beginning of RT was 30 days while the median interval between the end of RT and surgery was 41 days. The rate of primary complications was 66.6% including seroma secretion (reduced to 10.8% when seroma secretion was excluded). The necrosis rate was 5.4%. The average patient satisfaction score for the reconstruction was 17 out of 20. Five-year disease-free and overall survival rates were 93.2% and 98.3% respectively with a median follow-up of 31.6 months. There was only one case of local relapse diagnosed after seven years of follow-up. CONCLUSION: This study shows that our therapeutic sequence does not appear to increase IBR morbidity and remains within the acceptable safety margins of oncological treatment. It also gives a high quality aesthetic result that helps to maintain patient self-esteem.

[Male breast cancer: prognostic factors, diagnosis and treatment: a multi-institutional survey of 95 cases]. / Le cancer du sein chez l'homme: approche épidémiologique, diagnostique, et thérapeutique: étude multicentrique rétrospective à propos de 95 cas.

OBJECTIVES: The optimal treatment for male breast cancer is not known because male breast cancer is a rare disease. It represents as little as 0.6% of all breast cancers and less than 1% of human cancers. The aim was to analyze the clinical, histological and therapeutic characteristics of 95 men cared for breast cancer between 2000 and 2010 in four hospitals, and determine predictors of poor prognosis to improve care of male breast cancer. METHODS: This study is a multi-institutional survey, retrospective, involving four French institutions: Cancer Institute of the West (ICO), Reunion Island South hospital group, the hospital group of Dax, and the Bergonié Institute. All carcinomas in situ or invasive breast occurred in male patients were included. An analysis of clinical, histological and therapeutic features was performed. Statistical analysis of our study focused on the overall survival of patients and specific method of Kaplan-Meier, enabling search for predictors of poor prognosis. RESULTS: The mean age was 65 years. Thirty-seven percent of patients were overweight or obese. It was in 88% of cases of palpable tumor whose average size was 26.29mm. Ninety patients, none had a lesion palpable T0, 44% T1 tumors, 38% T2 tumors, 3% had a T3 tumors, and finally 10% T4 tumors. The histological type was the most common invasive ductal carcinoma (87%). He found a similar proportion of patients with or without lymph node involvement. N+ patients, capsular rupture was observed in 29% of cases. Receptor positivity was found, estrogen in 95% of cases and progesterone in 83% of cases. Additional irradiation was performed in 75% of patients and chemotherapy in 37% of patients. Overall survival was 79.2% at five years and 70.8% at ten years. Age, tumor size and histological capsular rupture are factors that significantly influence the overall survival and specific. CONCLUSION: Male breast cancer is a different pathology of breast cancer in women. The majority of recommendations suggest treating men who are diagnosed with breast cancer, using the guidelines applied to postmenopausal women treatments. There is no study based on male population that has evaluated these treatment modalities in terms of impact on survival. The diagnosis is usually made at later stages, and tumor size is often greater. Histological characteristics also differ. However, the treatment is almost identical.

[Prophylactic surgery in patients mutated BRCA or high risk: retrospective study of 61 patients in the ICO]. / La chirurgie prophylactique chez les patientes mutées BRCA ou à haut risque: étude rétrospective de 61 patientes de l'ICO.

BACKGROUND: Genetic predisposition is involved in only 10% of patients with breast cancer. This study was to evaluate the impact of prophylactic surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 61 patients who received prophylactic breast surgery. Data collection was carried out through the computer file of the ICO. The inclusion criteria were: patients who benefited from a bilateral prophylactic mastectomy. There were no exclusion criteria. Patients received a satisfaction questionnaire to complete. RESULTS: Our study included 61 patients, 67% had a history of breast cancer. Bilateral prophylactic surgery was performed in 40 patients. It was made an average of two interventions, 44.3% of them presented postoperative complications, 18% recovery. Forty-three patients were satisfied with the medical information before surgery. The end result matched the expectations of 54.4% and 67.4% of patients would be ready to start. It was found pain associated with breast surgery in 56.5% of patients and almost half reported a change in their sexual life. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Prophylactic mastectomy is the most effective technique to prevent the risk of breast cancer. The consequences of such an action are important. It is necessary to better select patients who would benefit most from this type of surgery.

[Perinatal outcome of monochorionic and dichorionic twin gestations: a study of 775 pregnancies at Reunion Island]. / Morbidité et mortalité périnatale des jumeaux et influence de la chorionicité: expérience de 10ans dans le Sud-Réunion. Étude de 775 grossesses.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the perinatal mortality and morbidity of infants born from monochorionic versus dichorionic twin pregnancies (TP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective, comparative study of monochorionic and dichorionic TP over 10 years in the south of Reunion Island. Information regarding demographic, gestational and perinatal variables of mothers and infants was collected from the hospital perinatal database. RESULTS: Six hundred and twenty dichorionic and 155 monochorionic TP were analyzed. In case of monochorionic TP, mothers had higher rates of pregnancy-related hypertension (OR=1.82, 95%CI=[1.02-3.29] ; P=0.03) and hospitalization (OR=1.48, 95%CI=[1.02-2.16]; P=0.03). Newborns from monochorionic TP had higher morbidity for : very preterm birth (birth before 33 weeks gestation) (OR=1.65, 95%CI=[1.02-2.66]; P=0.02), very low birth weight (birth weight<1500g) (OR=1.73, 95%CI=[1.57-3.13]; P<0.001), Apgar<7 at 1 minute (OR=1.76, 95%CI=[1.18-2.61]; P<0.01) and hospitalization (OR=2.08, 95%CI=[1.58-2.73]; P<0.001). Perinatal mortality was also significantly higher (OR=2.47, 95%CI=[1.54-3.94]; P<0.001), as well intrauterine fetal death (OR=3.96, 95%CI=[1.95-8.05]; P<0.001) CONCLUSION: This study confirms that few differences exist among dichorionic and monochorionic TP with regard to maternal morbidity, while neonatal morbidity and mortality are higher in twins born from monochorionic pregnancies.

[Quality of life after lipomodelling: retrospective study of 42 patients]. / Qualité de vie après lipomodelage: étude rétrospective à propos de 42 patientes.

OBJECTIVES: Study of the quality of life of 42 patients who underwent a lipofilling in our institution between 2009 and 2010. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Analysis of cosmetic outcomes, side effects, emotional life and preoperative information received by a cohort of 42 patients contacted by anonymous questionnaires. Comparisons between patients with a single prothesis, latissimus dorsi flap with prothesis, autologous latissimus dorsi flap and rectus abdominal flap. RESULTS: The response rate was 56% (42 patients). The average volume of fat injected was 80mL. The aspect of the reconstructed breast and the harmony between two breasts were better after lipofilling (P=0.0001, P=0.0005). The evolution of the aesthetic result is satisfying for 64.1% of the patients. In 29% of cases, patients noticed adhesions at the injection site. Apprehension to touch the reconstructed breast and to wear a swimsuit decreases after lipofilling (P=0.0345;P=0.0284). All patients declared to be satisfied with the presurgery information. Half of the patients declare that the final result corresponds to their wishes. DISCUSSION: The side effects of lipofilling were studied from an oncological point of view. Less publications describe the patients quality of life after lipofilling. This surgery improves the breast reconstruction results and helps patients in a social, affective and aesthetic way. Overall, lipofilling improves more consistency in patients reconstructed by single prothesis and improves more appearance in patients reconstructed by single flap. CONCLUSION: Lipofilling improves significantly patients' quality of life. A clinical research protocol (GRATSEC) is currently underway to extend its indications. The lipofilling should not replace a bad indication of breast reconstruction.